Continuing from the last post, they mentioned that besides getting back the principal plus 30% profit within 12 months, they also lock a portion of the remaining profit for trial on top of the 30% profit that they distribute back to investors.I then asked, isn’t it true that most cases don’t go to trial? Wouldn’t distributing 100% of the profits be better?They explained that it’s a probability game. A 20-30% annual return isn’t much; in this industry, people aim for multiple returns, meaning they want several times their investment back. The core reason they group multiple defendants into a single case is this: small settlements from multiple defendants... Continue reading