What if I told you there is a low risk, high reward strategy to profit from the legal system even if you are not a lawyer? What if I told you there is a way to make your money work for you while also fighting justice?
I’m living proof of this strategy. This is how I achieved financial freedom and retired on passive income in my 30s.
It’s called litigation financing.
So what exactly is litigation finance? It’s a third party like you and me who’s not a lawyer or involved in the legal dispute, providing capital to help pay for a lawsuit or claim in exchange for a profit. That profit can be an interest payment, or a share of the settlement and judgement in the end.
For example, do you ever see those “no win no fee” advertisements from different law firms on personal injury cases such as car accidents? I have been doing that for almost 10 years.
As a third party, I provide capital to the lawyers so they can take on cases while their clients don’t have to pay. When the case concludes, I have already earned my interest without lifting a finger, the client got justice and compensation from insurance for his or her injuries without having to pay any legal fees upfront, and the lawyer got his share of pay from the settlement as well.
You see, it’s a win win win situation and a third party like you and me have made this happen by being the funder for the lawyers. This is exactly how I have generated consistent passive income and I became financially free in my 30s.
“Here’s what makes this industry fascinating: In 2024, the global litigation finance market was valued at over $15 billion, and it’s projected to grow at 12% annually.” But here’s the kicker – most of this growth is happening because traditional legal funding models are broken.
Another example is patent litigation. Imagine a small company has patents which are infringed upon by big corporations and the damages are well worth $50 million+, but the plaintiff doesn’t have the upfront $1 million or so to get through the entire legal process.
Again, a litigation finance funder can come in and provide capital in exchange for a share of the profit in the end when the case settles or wins a judgement.
Now, at this point you are probably wondering: how come I have never heard of litigation financing?
You are not alone!
To be honest, 9 out of 10 people I talk to have never heard of litigation finance, and the remaining person is a lawyer him/herself which is why they know lol
So why is that? Why don’t the average person like you and me hear about it?
This is because the existing funders are all institutional!
Today, how it works is the following:
For process-driven cases such as personal injury claims, the bank gives a huge revolving line of credit to the law firms, and the law firms fund their lawyers with this line of credit, in exchange for a profit split in the end when every case concludes.
So, lawyers tend to stick with their law firms for funding so they just need to work on cases instead of worrying about financing so they can take on all the cases that come their way.
Where do everyday investors like you and me come in the picture? Nowhere. There’s no opportunity for you and me in this traditional model, so no wonder you have never heard of litigation finance!
For more complicated cases such as commercial litigation or intellectual property disputes, the cases usually originate at big law firms – the plaintiff is usually a decent-sized corporation themselves.
After knowing the details of the case, the law firm feels the odds of winning are very high and the potential judgment will be over $100M, so they take the case to a litigation funding firm who funds deals from $50M and upward, so the plaintiff doesn’t have to spend more money in the lawsuit whereas the litigation finance fund will provide capital in exchange for a portion of the winnings.
Where do everyday investors like you and me come in the picture? Again, Nowhere!
Also, this leaves small players whose intellectual property is infringed but do not have money to engage a law firm to begin with, stuck.
They are not even picked up by litigation funders because their cases are way too small.
So you see, litigation financing is a very profitable endeavour that’s been a best-kept secret among big law firms, banks, and institutional legal funds. That’s also why data on litigation finance is very limited, while the big boys have been enjoying great returns.
From what I can gather, the yearly returns on litigation funding are about 36%, while the settlement rate of all cases in the US is about 95%, meaning the vast majority of litigation finance cases settle instead of going to trial!
So how did I know about litigation finance?
I stumbled upon it because I was a victim in a car accident in my early 20s.
With legal representation, the payout was more from the auto insurance company, but the payout timeline was longer. I did settle and get paid in the end.
From that experience, I truly learned firsthand that personal injury law representing plaintiffs with indisputable injuries are low risk, high reward.
It’s so low risk that in fact, there is something called ATE (after-the-event) insurance, which is a third-party legal insurer, willing to guarantee personal injury claims for high-volume law firms.
Even insurance companies are willing to insure these cases. That tells you something about the risk profile of this asset class.
Eventually, I started funding my lawyer and his team as they became a top personal injury legal team, handling over a thousand cases at any given time.
Instead of a profit split, I arranged a high interest payment structure – annualized 10%+, paid upfront!
It’s highly liquid, and I can exit every 6 months, so the lawyers get to keep all of their profit, I earn high interest income, and justice is served.
This is how I retired in my 30s.
Many who heard of it through my website and newsletter also started trying it, with some eventually quitting their jobs.
In fact, we are the only non-institutional people I know who do litigation financing, and we even coined the term legal lending for personal injury lawyers.
This also led me to explore equity-style litigation finance, such as patent litigation, though I dislike the traditional model where returns depend on binary case outcomes.
I structured it differently – we target settlements instead of trials (which make up 95% of the market).
That means the returns come from smaller settlements across 30+ claims, money comes back every 12 months, and trial risk is eliminated.
The cost of upfront legal services is 50% cheaper, and now even small inventors and IP owners can afford to pursue claims against large corporations.
This way, on contract it’s 30%+ annualized, with diversification, high liquidity, and no dependency on winning a lawsuit.
There you have it! Now you know what litigation finance is – a secret weapon 99% of people haven’t heard of.
Let’s recap:
This is a win-win-win for investors, lawyers, and plaintiffs.
Many families are now living on passive income from this alternative investment strategy.
Want to get started? Join here.